The first Ghost Rider had Nicolas Cage zooming enjoyably about the place as Johnny Blaze, a flaming demon on his mighty motorbike, collecting damned souls for Satan – his side of a bargain he once sealed with the Evil One who undertook to cure his dad's cancer. Now Blaze is back for more throbbing daemonic adventures in 3D; he briefly reminds us of the fact that he did all this for his ailing father, but just as before, his dad's subsequent existence is of absolutely zero interest. There's less engine power in this sequel, and the original's healthy, dark humour is in short supply.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2012/feb/16/ghost-rider-spirit-of-ve...

Miles: 1345

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'll re-post my comments here:

Just saw it yesterday, they changed a LOT of things.  I definitely could have done without the 3d, it seemed to make some of the action scenes jerky and out of sorts.  They introduced a new tidbit of info about the Rider.  I admit I never read the comic, so I don't know if this new info is in keeping or not.  It made him appear more psycho!  All in all, it wasn't bad.  Apparently he can make other vehicles become fire-breathing beasts, too.

I'm not sure if I imagined it, but I could have sworn the intake on his bike kept switching sides, too!  I saw this on the regular bike (V rod), not his "Hell" bike.

Haven't seen the movie yet, just the ads. But I thought it was a V-wad. They should have kept the Pan.

I liked the original, I'll just have to see about the sequel.

They used a Yamaha V-Max for his bike.  There is an intake on both sides.  It's not a V-Rod.

JediRider said:

I'll re-post my comments here:

Just saw it yesterday, they changed a LOT of things.  I definitely could have done without the 3d, it seemed to make some of the action scenes jerky and out of sorts.  They introduced a new tidbit of info about the Rider.  I admit I never read the comic, so I don't know if this new info is in keeping or not.  It made him appear more psycho!  All in all, it wasn't bad.  Apparently he can make other vehicles become fire-breathing beasts, too.

I'm not sure if I imagined it, but I could have sworn the intake on his bike kept switching sides, too!  I saw this on the regular bike (V rod), not his "Hell" bike.

The V Max was a fast bike, no doubt about it.

BigTex79 said:

They used a Yamaha V-Max for his bike.  There is an intake on both sides.  It's not a V-Rod.

JediRider said:

I'll re-post my comments here:

Just saw it yesterday, they changed a LOT of things.  I definitely could have done without the 3d, it seemed to make some of the action scenes jerky and out of sorts.  They introduced a new tidbit of info about the Rider.  I admit I never read the comic, so I don't know if this new info is in keeping or not.  It made him appear more psycho!  All in all, it wasn't bad.  Apparently he can make other vehicles become fire-breathing beasts, too.

I'm not sure if I imagined it, but I could have sworn the intake on his bike kept switching sides, too!  I saw this on the regular bike (V rod), not his "Hell" bike.

Waste of time and money.

All righty then, I stand corrected!  I don't claim to be an expert on manufacturers or models, that was what I thought it was.  I think they should have kept the chopper, personally.  They should not have messed with the Rider's mannerisms, either.  Don't want to give away for those who have not seen.

BigTex79 said:

They used a Yamaha V-Max for his bike.  There is an intake on both sides.  It's not a V-Rod.

JediRider said:

I'll re-post my comments here:

Just saw it yesterday, they changed a LOT of things.  I definitely could have done without the 3d, it seemed to make some of the action scenes jerky and out of sorts.  They introduced a new tidbit of info about the Rider.  I admit I never read the comic, so I don't know if this new info is in keeping or not.  It made him appear more psycho!  All in all, it wasn't bad.  Apparently he can make other vehicles become fire-breathing beasts, too.

I'm not sure if I imagined it, but I could have sworn the intake on his bike kept switching sides, too!  I saw this on the regular bike (V rod), not his "Hell" bike.

I haven't seen the movie; I just knew that from an article I read.

If you are going to post on this site I expect that you be an expert on all makes and models.  You need to know how to expertly dissect a Norton while simultaneously rebuilding a shovel head.  If you cannot do both at the same time you aren't a real biker.

Also, I am completely full of crap.

JediRider said:

All righty then, I stand corrected!  I don't claim to be an expert on manufacturers or models, that was what I thought it was.  I think they should have kept the chopper, personally.  They should not have messed with the Rider's mannerisms, either.  Don't want to give away for those who have not seen.

BigTex79 said:

They used a Yamaha V-Max for his bike.  There is an intake on both sides.  It's not a V-Rod.

JediRider said:

I'll re-post my comments here:

Just saw it yesterday, they changed a LOT of things.  I definitely could have done without the 3d, it seemed to make some of the action scenes jerky and out of sorts.  They introduced a new tidbit of info about the Rider.  I admit I never read the comic, so I don't know if this new info is in keeping or not.  It made him appear more psycho!  All in all, it wasn't bad.  Apparently he can make other vehicles become fire-breathing beasts, too.

I'm not sure if I imagined it, but I could have sworn the intake on his bike kept switching sides, too!  I saw this on the regular bike (V rod), not his "Hell" bike.

So when will you be posting that instructional video, so us newbs can learn how ta do it right?  hehehe 

Don't waste your time or money on this movie.

yea  the vmax is an awesome bike with loads of horsepower and torque.. i would definately say its quick , but top speed falls short of fast. movie was ok. i liked the first one better. could do without 3D also

BigTex79 said:

They used a Yamaha V-Max for his bike.  There is an intake on both sides.  It's not a V-Rod.

JediRider said:

I'll re-post my comments here:

Just saw it yesterday, they changed a LOT of things.  I definitely could have done without the 3d, it seemed to make some of the action scenes jerky and out of sorts.  They introduced a new tidbit of info about the Rider.  I admit I never read the comic, so I don't know if this new info is in keeping or not.  It made him appear more psycho!  All in all, it wasn't bad.  Apparently he can make other vehicles become fire-breathing beasts, too.

I'm not sure if I imagined it, but I could have sworn the intake on his bike kept switching sides, too!  I saw this on the regular bike (V rod), not his "Hell" bike.

I loved the comic & loved this movie. First one. . . OK, its plot suked. I went just for the visuals. Awesome stunts, killer CGI and I thought it rocked! I'm easy tho. . .

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Announcements

This weeks Top 10 Create a Caption Finalists have been chosen. Click Here to Vote!

Getting too many emails? Click Here

© 2012   BikersPost.com Powered by Motorcycle Enthusiast

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service